|
|
Catching Up: Water
Battle Rages On Objectors file appeal in
Commonwealth Court over DEP permit of
chloramines. By Jason Scott, Sentinel
Reporter
July 21, 2008
- Susan Pickford knows the fight over using
chloramine in the West Shore water supply is a long way
from over.
|
Water war
Pennsylvania American Water Co. (PAWC) began
evaluating chloramines and other alternatives to
free chlorine at the start of the decade,
according to officials.
The water company says the switch to
chloramines on the West Shore, which was permitted
by the state Department of Environmental
Protection in 2006, is necessary to enable it to
meet federal drinking water requirements to reduce
the likelihood of disinfection byproducts.
A change in disinfection processes would take
place at PAWC treatment facilities that serve
roughly 35,000 people in Camp Hill, East Pennsboro
Township, Enola, Fairview Township, Hampden
Township, Lemoyne, Lower Allen Township, New
Cumberland, New Kingstown, Newberry Township,
Shiremanstown, Silver Spring Township, Upper Allen
Township and Wormleysburg.
In Pennsylvania, 73 water systems serving
approximately 4 million people — one out of three
people — rely on chloramines to effectively treat
drinking water.
PAWC has chloraminated water systems in
Norristown, Clarion, Yardley, Butler, Ellwood City
and the Scranton area.
Company officials say chloramine is a proven,
commonly used process that’s been around since the
early 20th century.
Susan Pickford, a Camp Hill lawyer who has
appealed state approval of the project to
Commonwealth Court, argues that the chemical
hasn’t been adequately studied and its byproducts
are more toxic than those associated with
chlorine, which is currently used as a
disinfectant.
The Public Utility Commission has scheduled a
hearing for Oct. 28-31 on the concerns raised by
Pickford and several others who oppose
chloramination of the West Shore water supply.
If PAWC is allowed to move forward, it plans to
implement the new disinfection process in early
2009.
A look back
The Sentinel first reported on the
planned chloramine conversion last August when
Pennsylvania American Water Co. announced it was
delaying the switch at its West Shore and Silver
Spring water treatment plans.
PAWC officials said the decision was made to
give people more time to transition to it.
A public meeting was then held in Camp
Hill in October with officials from the water
company, the EPA, DEP and state Department of
Health.
Over the better part of the last year,
opponents of the plan, including Susan Pickford of
Camp Hill, who started the Chloramine Information
Center, have since been fighting the company’s
objective to introduce chloramines into the water
supply. | Since last
August, the Camp Hill attorney has led the charge
against Pennsylvania American Water Co. and its plan to
add the chemical, a mixture of chlorine and ammonia, to
its area water systems to meet new federal drinking
water standards.
Pickford started the Chloramine
Information Center to help combat the PAWC project and
has taken the water war to court, hoping to overturn
state approval of its implementation.
“If we lose
at any level, we will appeal,” she said. “This is not a
matter of principle, it is a matter of our health, our
children’s health, the environment and the future of our
water resources. We won’t stop until we have stopped the
chloramine.”
PAWC was planning to introduce the
chemical to the West Shore in August 2007 but pulled
back over public concern. The
legal battle, which includes Pickford’s recent appeal to
Commonwealth Court and hearings before the Public
Utility Commission in October, has forced the company to
delay its plans until early 2009.
“We are
preparing for those hearings and fully expect the
questions to be resolved, so that we can implement
chloramine disinfection,” PAWC spokesman Terry Maenza
said.
With permits in hand from the state
Department of Environmental Protection, there is no
reason to look at other alternatives, Maenza
explained.
The federal Environmental Protection
Agency has set new rules that require water companies to
reduce byproducts formed when chlorine reacts with
naturally occurring organic matter in water. As a
result, many have turned to chloramine, which is one of
the cheapest alternatives.
PAWC maintains that it
is also a proven, commonly used disinfection method.
Since its first use in 1917, nearly one-third of water
systems across the country, serving more than 68 million
people, use chloramine, including 4 million in
Pennsylvania.
Since chloramine is not as reactive
as chlorine with organic materials, it produces
substantially lower concentrations of disinfection
byproducts, or DBPs, according to
PAWC.
Opponents, including Pickford and Josephine
Rakow, health officer for Camp Hill, say that there is
no evidence to suggest chloramine doesn’t have ill
effects.
“Chloramine is responsible for more
byproducts being formed in the distribution system,”
Pickford said.
Respiratory and skin symptoms are
among those most commonly associated with chloraminated
systems in other states.
One of the biggest
issues is that the chemical leaches lead from water
pipes and fittings, Rakow explained, which poses the
risk of elevated blood lead levels.
An increased
filtration system to remove organic matter will reduce
the byproducts from the chlorine and allow the company
to continue using chlorine and still meet EPA present
and future standards, Pickford argued.
Additional
chloramine concerns come into play when kidney dialysis
patients and fish are taken into account.
Because
water comes in contact with the bloodstream in the
dialysis process, chloramine is toxic if it is not
removed or filtered prior to use.
It also is
deadly to fish and other aquatic life if it’s not
removed from the water.
“The fish kill up there
around Boiling Springs would be devastating,” Rakow
said, citing a water spill in Virginia in April that
killed 90 percent of the fish population and other
incidents of water main breaks involving
chloramine.
West Shore’s water supply comes from
Conodoguinet and Yellow Breeches creeks.
“A main
break along the Yellow Breeches or Conodoguinet creeks
will destroy these treasures,” Pickford
added.
PAWC plans to attach an insert in the
August billing to its 35,000 West Shore customers to
address frequently asked questions about this issue,
Maenza said. |
| | |
Chloramine Information
Center
Cumberland County (Pennsylvania) residents
concerned about water treatment
Susan
Pickford, who has filed a formal complaint over the matter
with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, said
chloramines have caused health problems across the country,
mostly respiratory. She said the water companies have not
considered recent studies that show chloramines create more
dangerous by-products than chlorine. More
Info
Water
Watch in Cumberland County |